New liberal bills on the horizon suggest we no longer have a Constution

http://www.youtube.com/user/ReasonTV#p/u/46/TsKGt6NO-mw

The Democrats will soon, it appears, be pushing for a cadre of bills which only further confirm my view that today's left pretty much doesn't give a damn about the Constuition. One of the bills would create a new goverment agency: The Consumer Protection Agency. Another would actual have the Goverment (in other words, Nancy Pelosi) assume dictorial rule over the entire private sector, with the power to make Sears sell a certain product or make Morgan Stanley phrase a contract a certain way and the like. The other bills which are discussed in the Reason.tv link above have to do with potential new regulatory bills over the finicial sector which are less easy to summarize but definitly is, as with seemingly every item on the current liberal wishlist, a bit more than eyebrow raising.

My question is: Isn't this plan to force companys to sell certain products and to offer certain deals and how to write contracts flagrantly unconstinual?

I would think that this is not far from being taken to the Supreme Court if the bill passes but they don't discuss any potential Constuitional issues in the Reason.tv video. Have we gotten to the point where such a obviously unconstinual bill doesn't make poltical denizens of D.C. even blink?

All i know is that anybody who could propose a bill that would allow the goverment to force Wal-Mart to sell a Chanel purse that Nancy Pelosi likes alot does not either care about the Constuition or doesn't know anything about the Constuition.

Which reminds me of another unconstuitional liberal dream bill, what ever happened to the un-Fairness doctrine? Is it slated for next year on the Democratic agenda or doesn't have any support or merely not enough?